And no, widgets is not an alterlative to proper qml controls on desktop when you want custom interface. I have an app that uses qml to draw a custom listview for users, it would be extremely hard to replicate it with widgets and why should I do that when I have qml?
On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 4:10 PM, NIkolai Marchenko <[email protected]> wrote: > I basically can't use Controls 2 in my application because combobox in > controls 2 has extremely out of place style for desktop applications, is > too bloated and you can't control it enough to make it look more like > Controls 1. > Admittedly, I almost do not use QML in my apps but I wasn't able to find > an easy solution to make combobox tolerable for desktop > > On Wed, Feb 7, 2018 at 4:06 PM, Helmut Mülner <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> >> > It should come as no big surprise that we are not working much on Qt >> Quick Controls 1. >> After some discussions inside The Qt Company, we concluded that it would >> make sense to clarify the situation. >> We see the value Controls 1 provides - more platform native styling - but >> it comes at a high price. >> >> > […] >> > As you can see, the effort is currently split and we'd like to reduce >> the attention to the two big areas - Widgets and Quick with Controls 2. This >> means we will spend even less time on Controls 1, where we'll only fix >> critical issues in the future. >> >> In my application I mostly use Controls 2 but have to add some controls >> from Qt Quick Controls 1, e.g. TableView, SplitView, Calendar, ScrollView. >> It would be nice to have these controls available in Controls 2 before you >> deprecate Controls 1. >> >> >> >> Regards >> >> Helmut >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Development mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development >> >> >
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
