On Sat, 02 Dec 2017 17:48:19 +0100 Marc Mutz <marc.m...@kdab.com> wrote:
> > 1) the std implementation varies with compiler vendors, each one with a > > different set of bugs, unit tests and sometimes performance. While with > > Qt, the implementation is more uniform. This to say, I feel more secure > > using Qt implementations for an application that runs on multiple > > platforms. And cross-platform is the core business of Qt... > > You make it sound as if std implementations are much more buggy than Qt's. I > don't even know how to respond. I'm sure STL, Marshal Clow, Howard Hinnant, > and all the others std library implementers will be pleased with your > analysis. This is not what I said. I want to say that all libraries have bugs, without telling that Qt is better or worse. But for a cross-platform developer, it is better to deal with one implementation than many. When a bug only happens on one platform, and you ship a cross-platform application, this it not cool! Philippe _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
