And offtop - what about allocators? They would be accesibble for wrappers, but not accesible for QVector/QString?
Something sure, a Qt6 feature such as std::pmr::memory_resource (cf. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v3dz-AKOVL8) would be more than welcome for Qt containers and strings. Philippe On Wed, 1 Nov 2017 15:23:04 +0300 ???? ?????????? <abba...@gmail.com> wrote: Sorry for digging the thread, but how is > * use qssize_t > and > ** Wrapping std::{unordered_}map may be acceptable > combines? > > std::*map uses size_t in it's API (size, max_size, count, reserve, > begin(size_type), end(size_type)) > > > And offtop - what about allocators? They would be accesibble for wrappers, > but not accesible for QVector/QString? > >
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
