On Wednesday, 30 August 2017 00:30:05 PDT Olivier Goffart wrote: > We can change the documentation and recommend against using killTimer and > startTimer. QBasicTimer should be used instead. This would have probably > avoided the problem in this case (as one would have called stop instead of > m_updateTimer = 0). And in general is easier to use for 0 overhead.
Actually, there is an overhead, albeit very small one: the timer ID is stored. Your class may not need the timer ID. It can stop the timer by using QTimerEvent::timerId() when the timer fires. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
