Thiago: >> If you're going to communicate with a tiny MCU connected over a mesh >> network like 6LoWPAN/Thread, you won't be using TCP. Much less HTTP.
and you'll want that MCU running something light-weight in C++, not a web-bloat thing. So Qt is just the thing for the job. (... and I had to google MCU - microcontroller unit, not Marvel Comic Universe ;^) Jean-Michaël Celerier (29 August 2017 10:20) > What makes me a bit sad is that if Qt's not doing it, then we end up > having to put up with bloated stuff like Node.JS on beagleboard or > raspberries : > https://www.postscapes.com/javascript-and-the-internet-of-things/ > which are now more and more used. Hell, sometimes people use python > of all languages on constrained CPUs. It's a niche that Qt *could* > fill, and fill better than the alternatives. We are aware of it [*] and looking at what to do. We are, however, short of hands and up to our necks in things to do. [*] https://wiki.qt.io/Qt_Network_Workshop_2016#IoT Eddy. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
