> On 4 May 2017, at 16:51, Sergio Martins <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 2017-05-04 15:18, Thiago Macieira wrote: >> Em quinta-feira, 4 de maio de 2017, às 06:58:53 PDT, Konstantin Tokarev >> escreveu: >>> But we could have Linux clang configuration with clazy plugin. >> Why? Clazy is not part of our development philosophy. We should only do that >> after there's a QUIP explaining which options in Clazy we use (which there >> isn't). > > Probably the QUIP shouldn't be about clazy /per se/, but about which coding > practices we want to enforce via static analysis tooling. > clazy's current warning set could be used as a starting base for the > discussion though, because it exists.
This is getting a bit off topic ;-) Enforcing certain coding standards is probably a good idea. And we might be able to enforce more things in CI once the work on the virtualisation layer is done and we can scale up the available hardware. > > But more about that *later*! There's interesting things in the pipeline which > KDAB would like to show first. > Looking forward to that :) Cheers, Lars _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
