04.05.2017, 17:17, "Thiago Macieira" <[email protected]>: > Em quinta-feira, 4 de maio de 2017, às 06:51:45 PDT, Konstantin Tokarev > escreveu: >> I'm leaning towards "6.0.0" number, because it's larger than any 5.x and >> makes it clear that versioning is different now. Bug fixes will increment >> patch version (6.0.x), WebKit updates minor version (6.1.x etc), API/ABI >> breaking changes - major verison (7.0 etc.) > > I thought you weren't breaking either source or binary compatibility.
Correct. > So using a new major number sounds wrong. Yes. But using 5.$large_number seems wrong too, because there is no hard upper limit for Qt 5.x series > > And what would you do when Qt 6 gets released in a couple of years? There will be QtWebKit 7.x by then, because there are some desirable changes that would break ABI. There is no clear plan yet, though. > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
