19.04.2017, 21:37, "Darin Broady" <[email protected]>: > Is there a reason a new member function for QScopedPointerObjectDeleteLater > that conforms to the interface specified by std::default_delete would not > work? > > void QScopedPointerObjectDeleteLater::operator()(T *pointer) const { if > (pointer) pointer->deleteLater(); }
No strong reason, this was one of my thoughts too. One minor thing is that it won't have anything to do with QScopedPointer. > > Darin Broady > [email protected] > > On Wednesday, April 19, 2017 9:44 AM, Konstantin Tokarev <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Hello, > > I think it will be a good idea to provide implementation of functor calling > deleteLater() instead of delete which can be used with std::unique_ptr, > std::shared_ptr and other smart pointers with compatible interface. > > We already have QScopedPointerObjectDeleteLater, however it implements > cleanup(T*) instead of operator()(T*). > > Any suggestions how to name this new class and where to place it? > > -- > Regards, > Konstantin > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
