Em domingo, 16 de abril de 2017, às 15:16:54 PDT, Mark Gaiser escreveu: > Ohh, that's great! > > One question. Would it be possible and sane to - by default - provide > it as the patch implements it there, but with the addition of a define > that can influence the behavior of the iterators?
Most llikely no. Just look at the problem that QT_STRICT_ITERATORS causes. We shouldn't make the same mistake again. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
