Em sexta-feira, 14 de abril de 2017, às 22:38:25 PDT, Randall O'Reilly escreveu: > One of the major innovations in Go is that it avoids all of those problems. > You only ever write things once, in one place (no .h vs. .cpp), and, like > an interpreted language, the only distribution mechanism *is the source > itself*. There is no such thing as binary compatibility.
Because there's no such thing as binary distribution in the first place. That means you cannot provide a component without the source. If we insisted on all Qt users simply recompiling every time that Qt changed, then we could apply the same to C++ and only retain source compatibility. That is, after all, what Boost does. By the way, is it even possible to distribute a binary application? [cut] > hence my advocacy of Qt potentially investing some effort here. Seems like we already have a binding to Go. What else do we need? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
