On 24 February 2017 at 06:08, Ch'Gans <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hi guys, > > Who do I need to invite as reviewers for these typo fixes? > https://codereview.qt-project.org/186292 > > > Thanks, > Chris
Hi Chris, I'm happy to review documentation patches. > On 8 February 2017 at 11:03, Ch'Gans <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 7 February 2017 at 23:18, Edward Welbourne <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > [...] > >> > >> Sze Howe Koh (7 February 2017 04:35) replied: > >>> See http://wiki.qt.io/Branch_Guidelines (Note: Qt module repositories > >>> don't have a "master" branch) > >>> > >>> Right now, the branches that accept documentation fixes are: > >>> > >>> * 5.8 (stable branch) > >>> * 5.9 (next release branch) > >>> * dev (development branch) > >>> > >>> Simply put, patches will merge from the top of the list to the bottom > >>> of this list. For example, patches that go into "5.8" will eventually > >>> be merged into "5.9", which in turn will eventually be merged into > >>> "dev". > >>> > >>> Typo fixes are not new features or major/risky changes, so they can go > >>> into the stable branch ("5.8"). > >> > >> Indeed. This is all being formalised in QUIP 5: > >> https://codereview.qt-project.org/178906 > >> where you can find out all you wish to know about which changes should > >> go to which branches, > > > > Thanks both of you for the information. > > Chris > > > >> > >> Eddy. Regards, Sze-Howe _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
