On segunda-feira, 6 de fevereiro de 2017 10:33:52 PST Edward Welbourne wrote: > Thiago Macieira (3 February 2017 17:45) > > > It's irrelevant when the function called is one of ours, in a library > > of ours that got compiled with -fno-exceptions. It'll never > > throw. Even the few libraries we compile with exceptions will never > > throw. *Especially* the functions that would not allocate memory > > anyway, just increase a refcount. > > If the unused code gets loaded into memory, then it's not entirely > irrelevant; it is costing run-time memory and making caches miss > more often. Smaller code runs faster.
Yes, but it's very hard to measure. I do agree in shrinking our code however much we can (which is why I'd like to suppress the unwind tables completely). -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
