Em sexta-feira, 27 de janeiro de 2017, às 10:10:45 PST, Konrad Rosenbaum escreveu: > I'm not sure whether this argument is persuasive for you: industry will > stay on IPv4 private networks (192.168.*, 10.*, 172.16.*, etc.) for a LONG > time. The networks are working, the infrastructure is known to every admin > out there, and lots of software has problems with IPv6 if it supports it > at all! > > In fact quite a few of my colleagues will not recognize 2001:db8::42 as a > valid IP address... > > In short: IPv4 (including multicast, which is used for "message buses") > has to work well for the foreseeable future. Even on an OS that we both > would not recommend for production use...
I understand it and I don't doubt you. But I won't do the work. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
