On Thu, Jan 26, 2017 at 09:51:24AM +0100, Edward Welbourne wrote:
> I don't know what you're saying, much less why it's supposed to be the
> obvious interpretation.  A "tagged commit" is presumably v5.7.0 or
> similar; why should a commit without an amends line be assumed to
> relate to one of these ?
> 
i used "tagged commit" as a shorthand for "a commit which is reachable
from a tag", which should be fairly clear from the context. i.e., "git
tag --contains <sha1>" returns something.
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to