> -----Original Message-----
> From: Development [mailto:development-
> bounces+tuukka.turunen=qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Shawn
> Rutledge
> Sent: torstaina 22. joulukuuta 2016 9.25
> To: development@qt-project.org; releas...@qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] Proposal to adjust release candidate process
>
>
> > On 22 Dec 2016, at 08:09, Maurice Kalinowski <maurice.kalinow...@qt.io>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hence,
> >
> > Technology Preview
> > Preview
> > Release Preview
> > Release Candidate
> > Release
>
> Tech Preview is so far the term for a module which is released but we
> reserve the right to continue making API changes anyway, right? So changing
> that might be confusing.
>
> And besides, alpha and beta are traditional and well understood. (Following
> that pattern though, I guess we ought to call the RC a “gamma”, but that’s
> not traditional for some reason.)
>
:)
If we do not want to call the first development release from the release branch
"Release Candidate 1", then I think calling it "Release Preview" is a good
approach.
Yours,
Tuukka
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development@qt-project.org
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
