On terça-feira, 22 de novembro de 2016 16:07:25 PST Thiago Macieira wrote: > On terça-feira, 22 de novembro de 2016 23:46:32 PST Jake Petroules wrote: > > > - For MinGW I propose to start delivering 64 bit binary packages instead > > > of 32 bit one & start using MinGW 6.x (6.2?) > > > > Does this make sense when we're still delivering 32-bit MSVC packages? I'd > > opt to keep 32-bit or have both. > > I agree with Jake: replacing one with the other is not a good idea. We > should provide both for a time, before dropping 32-bit.
If we still have time, I'd like to see MinGW 64-bit for 5.8, so we can drop the 32-bit binary build in time for 5.9. Otherwise, if we have to wait for 5.9 to bring MinGW 64-bit, then we can't drop 32-bit until 5.10. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
