On lunes, 21 de noviembre de 2016 23:18:08 ART Marco Bubke wrote: [snip] > I strongly agree with Andre'. And is a BC break in the time of flat pack > that bad? As an user I really looking forward to flat pack, so I can > update my heavily used Applications and being not dependent on > distribution.
Well, what about all the rest of applications? Your heavily used apps (and *libs*, don't forget them) are not necessarily other user's. For what it's worth you can see in [qtbase.txt] a list of packages that would get removed from Debian if we where to remove qtbase right now. In other words, the list of apps and libs that would be affected by an ABI breackage. You can also think on the amount of flatpacks you would need to make. [qtbase.txt] <http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ben/qtbase.txt> -- lo cual parece incompatible. lógica, esa tendrá particiones dentro, si se transforma la extendida a tiene particiones lógicas, luego extendida. Una extendida estar dentro de una partición Una partición lógica necesita Diga NO al topposting. Matias Silva Bustos Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
