On segunda-feira, 21 de novembro de 2016 23:18:08 PST Marco Bubke wrote: > I strongly agree with Andre'. And is a BC break in the time of flat pack > that bad? As an user I really looking forward to flat pack, so I can > update my heavily used Applications and being not dependent on > distribution. This package could be much better optimize with LTO and > profile guided optimization. Maybe sharing everything is not that smart > anymore.
FlatPaks don't work for Qt. Reasons: /usr/lib64/qt5/plugins/styles/breeze.so /usr/lib64/qt5/plugins/platformthemes/KDEPlasmaPlatformTheme.so If you include Qt in your flatpak or equivalent, then your Qt application will not load the system plugins and will thus not have native look and feel in a Plasma desktop or in LXQt. If you don't include Qt or if the included Qt loads plugins, then BC is required. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
