On Tue, Nov 08, 2016 at 04:50:00PM +0100, Louai Al-Khanji wrote: > +1 for qt/quips, I don't think of it as a web site thing either. > well, i don't want it in qt/ - this is not a generic namespace for stuff that doesn't fit elsewhere. everything in there *should* be aggregated by qt5.git (with an accurate status field), or be a submodule of an aggregated module.
i can offer meta/ as an alternative. or maybe qtqt/ - that one already exists, but i suspect the objections will be the same as to www/. > Kai Koehne wrote: > > I'd slightly prefer > > > > qt/quips > > > > because it's not directly related to the website, even if we'll generate an > > html presentation out of it. We might even consider adding it to qt/qt5.git > > at > > one point ... > that makes no sense to me at all. the scope if this is certainly wider than the qt product itself. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
