On Montag, 12. September 2016 22:04:47 CEST Ch'Gans wrote:
> On 12 September 2016 at 21:13, Mathias Hasselmann
> 
> <math...@taschenorakel.de> wrote:
> > Hello Chris,
> 
> [...]
> 
> > Besides clazy being blasting fast you are comparing apples with oranges.
> > The issues clazy blames are plain Qt usage bugs. Just the same kind of
> > issues the compiler reports for regular C++ already. Ideally the
> > compilers would checks those issues out of the box already. Obviously
> > they can't because Qt layers stuff on top of C++.
> 
> BTW, have you tried to use clazy by adding the flags in QtC C++ clang
> model? (tools->options->C++->code model)
> I have no clue if it is even doable, i'm just asking.

It's possible. We did that in KDevelop. But it depends on a libclang patch 
that was not yet accepted upstream:

https://reviews.llvm.org/D15729

Cheers

-- 
Milian Wolff | milian.wo...@kdab.com | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH&Co KG, a KDAB Group company
Tel: +49-30-521325470
KDAB - The Qt Experts

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to