Em segunda-feira, 5 de setembro de 2016, às 18:46:41 PDT, Giuseppe D'Angelo 
escreveu:
> Il 05/09/2016 17:04, Alexander Nassian ha scritto:
> > Is, or should, that even be supported? I’m just wondering because when
> > I’m using Qt to create a thread, I also use Qt to quit it. Why should
> > anybody use a „foreign“ API?
> 
> Maybe one is just using a 3rd party library that assumes pthreads, not Qt.
> 
> Again, this is not the point, the point is that this used to work (users
> relying on undocumented behaviour) and I was about to break that
> behaviour. I wanted consensus before proceeding.

Note one more wrinkle in this: we never promised that pthread_exit(), in 
specific, would work. However, the fact that QThreadPrivate::finish is run by 
way of a cleanup function is indicative that someone in the past tried and 
QThread was changed to support cancellation.

It's more likely that it was inserted so that QThread::terminate would emit 
the termination signals.

Which in turn brings about *another* wrinkle: if we don't add the workaround, 
thr->terminate() will terminate the entire application. That's not acceptable.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to