On miercuri, 27 iulie 2016 10:35:01 EEST André Somers wrote: > Op 27/07/2016 om 09:53 schreef BogDan Vatra: > >> That said, it would be a behavior change not to allow anymore the > >> previous > >> (unscoped) syntax to work with QML > > > > The unscoped enums should work as they are woring now, just the scoped > > ones > > should be scoped in QML as well. > > > > Based on your patch, I'll try to prepare a patch for QML. > > Would that not break existing QML applications that now use enums backed > by scoped enums in C++? >
It will, but personaly I can't see a better solution ... So, either we break the existing QML apps that used scoped enums in C++ (which is useless, because in QML side you'll get name clashing) or we keep it as it is now and never "fix" it. I'd like the first option :). Of course if we can find a better solution to have them both is even better ! Cheers, BogDan. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
