On quarta-feira, 6 de julho de 2016 11:08:22 PDT Marc Mutz wrote: > The underlying theme here, I think, is: idiomatic code. Qt has its set of > idioms (like ending QObject subclass ctors in QObject *parent=nullptr), but > it largely ignores C++ idioms. And that leads to complicated code and > throws off contributors that are used to idiomatic C++. [cut] > C++ is the language Qt is written in. You need to learn the language's > idioms.
I dispute calling them "C++ idioms". Can you prove that all other major C++ libraries except Qt use them? For example, Google code, Folly, etc. Do they all use those idioms? Are their developers familiar with it? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
