> -----Original Message-----
> From: Development [mailto:development-
> [email protected]] On Behalf Of Sean Harmer
> Sent: perjantaina 24. kesäkuuta 2016 11.23
> To: [email protected]
> Subject: Re: [Development] [Releasing] brown paper bag issue in Qt 5.6.1
> packages
>
> -- clip ---
> This is why we have a process. How is this situation compatible with TQC's ISO
> 9001 certification?!
>
Hi Sean,
Making a fix release fits well with the release process of the ISO 9001
certification, no problems there.
In general, it is valuable to be able to make releases quickly to fix e.g. a
security vulnerability. The fastest way to do it is to push the needed change
(or changes) into the release branch, and create new release directly from
there. I do not have any strong opinion if the number of the release should be
x.y.z.1 , x.y.z-1 or even x.y.(z+1). Earlier the notation has been -1, but if
there is desire to change it going forward, I do not think that is a problem.
Yours,
Tuukka
> Sean
> --
> Dr Sean Harmer | [email protected] | Managing Director UK KDAB
> (UK) Ltd, a KDAB Group company Tel. +44 (0)1625 809908; Sweden (HQ) +46-
> 563-540090
> Mobile: +44 (0)7545 140604
> KDAB - Qt Experts
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
