Le 14 juin 2016 13:22, "Sze Howe Koh" <[email protected]> a écrit : > > On 7 May 2016 at 12:20, Joseph Crowell <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 4/05/2016 7:39 PM, Lars Knoll wrote: > >> > >> On 02/05/16 14:37, "Development on behalf of Sze Howe Koh" <[email protected] on behalf of [email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >>> Hello, > >>> > >>> The LICENSE.GPLvX and LICENSE.LGPLvX files from > >>> http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/tree/ (and submodules) start with > >>> "The Qt Toolkit is Copyright (C) 2015...", but then they go on to say > >>> "You may use, distribute and copy the Qt GUI Toolkit under the terms > >>> of..." > >>> > >>> Is this correct? What about non-GUI parts of the toolkit? > >> > >> The GUI in here is just a historical thing. It applies to Qt. > > > > > > Wording should probably should be changed then as times have changed and Qt is certainly no longer just a GUI toolkit. > > Here's the first batch, targeting the "5.6" branch. If this is OK, > I'll submit similar patches for the other repos too: > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/162394/ > > Some more questions: > > 1) What about http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/tree/LGPL_EXCEPTION.txt > ? It's currently presented as additional permissions on top of LGPL > v2.1. I presume LGPL v3.0 should be included too?
I'd like to get an answer to this question. If the exception doesn't apply to LGPLv3 then people might not be able to make proprietary applications with Qt. Because without it, the LGPLv3 only give exception for inline functions of less than 10 lines, meaning that developers would have to check every Qt header for every release to ensure there are no 11+ line long inline functions. Also without the exception, I see no points in using LGPL as I guess there should be at least one inline/template function breaking the 10 line limit. > 2) https://blog.qt.io/blog/2016/01/13/new-agreement-with-the-kde-free-qt-foundation/ > says that "Qt 5.7 will not be available under LGPLv2.1 anymore" -- > Does that mean LICENSE.LGPLv21 should be removed from the 5.7 branch > onwards? > I'm wondering if having these license files still in there doesn't automatically make Qt 5.7 available under LGPLv2.1? Maybe Dr Till Jaeger has an answer. > > >> Cheers, > >> Lars > > > Regards, > Sze-Howe > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development BR Benjamin Terrier
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
