On quinta-feira, 25 de fevereiro de 2016 17:33:52 PST Cristian Adam wrote: > This might be a burden for some of the Qt developers (Windows ones). > > But all the Qt users get a modern / flexible moc, see this thread: > https://www.reddit.com/r/cpp/comments/470ama/qt_moc_myths_debunked/d09c90e
I don't think we need a more flexible moc. What do we want to do that we can't do with the current one? Don't say "template QObjects". That has other reasons for being a bad idea, currently. Is it Olivier's maintenance burden? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
