On January 24, 2016 17:45:36 Kevin Kofler <kevin.kof...@chello.at> wrote:
> Marc Mutz wrote: >> (numThread == 2, same box) >> >> Copying is still not significantly slower than ref-counting, even for 4K >> elements. > > But it is already slower with as little as 32 elements, and stops being > significantly faster already at 16 elements. > > And now try with numThread == 1 for some extra fun. :-) A lot of code out > there is still single-threaded. > Yes but in the future the processors getting more and more parallel. If I am working on the bigger dataset with parallel algorithms I don't want to share writes to the same cache like. Something which CoW is providing. > Kevin Kofler > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development -- Sent from cellphone, sorry for the typos _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
