Le vendredi 22 janvier 2016 à 01:13 +0100, Kevin Kofler a écrit :
> > I think Qt should ignore the "wider C++ community", too. The STL is really a > completely different beast, we only share the language-level parts. That statement sounds very harsh. Please remember that your users are part of this « wider C++ community », in the sense that they rarely use Qt only. Any effort (and lots have already been done, thanks) to make Qt integrate well with other C++ code, including one that relies on modern techniques*) is greatly appreciated. I completely agree with Mark here in his statement that the lack of communication between Qt community and C++ wider community deserve both. Regards, Julien * since this thread has been talking about dangling references, please have a look at https://github.com/isocpp/CppCoreGuidelines/blob/master/docs/Lifetimes% 20I%20and%20II%20-%20v0.9.1.pdf and what will (hopefully) land in our compilers in the upcoming years
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
