On Sunday 18 October 2015 21:27:31 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote: > That the proposal is that every single function currently taking a > QString should instead be changed to take a QStringView instead, unless > a few exceptional cases (for instance the function is used to store the > string somehow, plus other cases under discussion). Similar case for > return values. If that doesn't look like a radical change to you...
Return values must always be QString, never QStringView. Returning a view is like returning a reference and goes against Qt's library code policy. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
