> -----Original Message----- > [...] > >BTW: functions storing a passed QString as-is should provide a > >QString&& overload, and that might be a good idea even when otherwise > >using QStringView only. > > Yes, agree with this.
I guess this advice is not only for QString arguments though (from 5.7 onwards). Which other types should get an && overload? Does API exposed via Q_PROPERTY/ QML benefit from an r-value reference overloads, too? I think it's a good idea to create some recommendations for 5.7 now, before everyone develops his own rules ... Kai _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
