On Wednesday 01 July 2015 21:03:21 Sune Vuorela wrote: > I think we mostly avoid QPair in api's (because it is generally not very > documenting in API). I don't see why std::tuple is any different.
I agree with Sune here. Please create your struct with the types in question and proper names. And that's only for very simple structs. Anything more complex should get a d pointer[*] and become a value-type class. Examples: QNetworkAddressEntry, QNetworkCookie, etc. [*] getting a d pointer does not mean getting rid of the private members. See the Qt 6 task for QDateTime, for example. It's also possible to have classes with no d pointer, but you need to be absolutely sure there's no chance of extension for the next 10 years. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
