On Friday 12 June 2015 18:58:59 Marc Mutz wrote: > On Friday 12 June 2015 16:37:15 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Friday 12 June 2015 12:12:17 Olivier Goffart wrote: > > > Which mean using things like std::function, std::unique_ptr, in our ABI. > > > Should we allow that? > > > > The problem is deciding between std::function and std::__1::function. > > Is __1 now standard? Or just a placeholder for what Clang's libc++ uses?
It's what libc++ uses, which is the real problem. For as long as there are systems where you can opt into libstdc++ or libc++, we should avoid hardcoding one or the other. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
