Il 12/11/2014 09:22, Holger Hans Peter Freyther ha scritto: > On Tue, Nov 11, 2014 at 09:41:49AM +0000, Knoll Lars wrote: > > Good Morning Lars, > >> Well, if you’re doing a complex multimedia app, this might be the right >> approach. But for the 90% use case (show a video, play a sound, capture >> something from the camera), we can’t tell people to write 10 different >> implementations for the 10 platforms/OSes we support. > Well, somebody needs to support these 10 platforms. And to make > it worse. With things like GStreamer.. a lot depends on the used > plugins. So any abstraction built needs to be superior to Phonon > to help in detecting and debugging crazy vendor stuff. Why phonon(t1) could not be made superior to phonon(t0) ? And benefit both qt and kde in the process?
> > When things don't work the promise of Qt falls apart (no matter > how crappy that vendor plugin is, specially when playbin just > does the right thing). And when the cost of debugging/analyzing > is higher than the cost of integrating directly with the OS > multimedia stack it looks worse. > > How is multimedia different from the X11/Win extras? > > > holger > _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
