On Fri, Sep 19, 2014 at 10:48 PM, Jeremy <jeremy.k.l...@gmail.com> wrote: > It’s the repo hosted on qt-project.org and clones such as qt.gitorious.org > that I’m wondering about. Leaving qtjsondb at its current URL is not what I > would expect for something that is not part of the Qt 5 bundle. Do we start a > qt-abandoned tree? qtplayground is too optimistic.
We have plenty of other code in similar circumstances (qtwayland pre-5.4, qtpim, ...) that aren't released but may be Some Day (or might not, if nobody cares about them). I don't think the URL really says all that much about something necessarily, and moving things around is a hassle (technically and socially) I'd just leave it _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
