On 05/09/14 21:55, "Thiago Macieira" <[email protected]> wrote:
>On Friday 05 September 2014 14:41:40 Saether Jan-Arve wrote: >> If we simply provide qt_US.ts, and the user uses windeployqt it will >> automatically be deployed in the same way as other .qm files, and it >>will >> just work (tm). > >I insist that we choose one of two alternatives: > >1) provide, deploy inside Qt and automatically load the .qm file for >English No, I think we should automatically load the best matching translation. Of course that can be (and often is) english. Cheers, Lars > >2) not require a .qm for *any* message in Qt > >Lars's email makes it clear he doesn't want a 2-form tr() overload. If we >take >that as guidance, #2 means stripping any message containing plurals from >the >Qt sources. > >-- >Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > >_______________________________________________ >Development mailing list >[email protected] >http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
