On Tuesday 19 August 2014 00:09:19 Allan Sandfeld Jensen wrote: > On Monday 18 August 2014, you wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 7:57 PM, Allan Sandfeld Jensen <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > Is it a problem that they have fake dependencies listed in gerrit? I > > > often upload lists of patches like that, and land them out of order as > > > they get reviewed. It appears to pose no particular problem, except that > > > it can look a bit odd. > > > > Me too, if I'm lazy. It can confuse some reviewers (small problem), > > but the annoyance I've faced is that rebasing will bump all changes > > after the commit you actually change. Having multiple source branches > > avoids that. > > Well, I solve that by rebasing the patch on a clean branch if I need to > rebase. The patches that used be after it will then have a dependency with > the tag (OUTDATED), but they still work and stage fine.
It's possible to send them all in one go, but you'll need to do the cherry- picking manually. git push gerrit `list all cherry-picked commits | sed 's,$,:refs/for/5.4,'` -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
