On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 8:09 AM, Olivier Goffart <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Thursday 10 July 2014 07:53:29 Keith Gardner wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 10, 2014 at 7:31 AM, Olivier Goffart <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > On Monday 02 June 2014 13:24:55 Richard Moore wrote: > > > > On 2 June 2014 13:12, Keith Gardner <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jun 2, 2014 at 2:36 AM, Simon Hausmann wrote: > > > > > > I suggest a name that is more centric towards the _function_ of > the > > > > > > class, comparison of different software versions. > [...] > > > > How about QVersionComparator? > > > > > > How about qVersionCompare(const QString&, const QString&)? > > > Yes, that's a function. Is there really the need for a class to hold > just > > > a version string? > > > > > > And there could be an overload with a SuffixComparator. > > > > > > (or is qCompareVersion an even better name?) > > > Currently, the QVersion::compare has an overload to pass a functor that > > performs the suffix comparison. Are you suggesting having a "default" in > > the operators that can be overwritten? > > I suggest not having any new classes. Just a function. (or a couple of > functions) > Sorry for the confusion. I was talking about a function pointer similar to qInstallMessageHandler.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
