On Friday, June 27, 2014 13:10:17 Thiago Macieira wrote: > Em sex 27 jun 2014, às 21:28:41, André Pönitz escreveu: > > This pretty much sounds like "If a module uses private API it should > > follow Qt Core numbering, if it doesn't it's free to pick anything." > > Sounds like a good compromise to me.
Not to me. 1) A module may start not using private API and add it later. 2) It is an increase in 'the number of standards'. That is not useful. > If a module wants to release out-of-schedule, it will need to use an extra > version number, like 5.4.0.1. And 5.4.1.1 and 5.4.2.1 etc. The time between patch releases is already very short. Even the time between minor releases is reliably short at 6 months. Thanks, -- Join us at Qt Developer Days 2014 in Berlin! - https://devdays.kdab.com Stephen Kelly <[email protected]> | Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
