Putting my 2¢ in, Qmake is IMHO good enough. Qbs is kind of vaporware, sparse 
documentation, needs Qmake to build (woot?!).

Altogether it sounds like a clinch, we don't want to extent Qmake with ninja or 
anything, because there comes Qbs. But Qbs isn't really there, because one 
needs lot of work to make it more less feature equal to CMake. So we are back 
to Qmake, huh.

Regards,
-- 
Adam
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to