Ok, let’s keep it as an add-on for now. I’m happy with that solution as well.

When it comes to the QML API, I do agree with Simon that having compatibility 
with the standard JS web sockets API is important so people can re-use code. 
But that doesn’t have to exclude a more declarative QML API.

Cheers,
Lars


From: Kurt Pattyn <pattyn.k...@gmail.com<mailto:pattyn.k...@gmail.com>>
Date: Monday 20 January 2014 13:15
To: "development@qt-project.org<mailto:development@qt-project.org>" 
<development@qt-project.org<mailto:development@qt-project.org>>
Cc: Lars Knoll <lars.kn...@digia.com<mailto:lars.kn...@digia.com>>, Richard 
Moore <r...@kde.org<mailto:r...@kde.org>>, Peter Hartmann 
<phartm...@blackberry.com<mailto:phartm...@blackberry.com>>, Konstantin Ritt 
<ritt...@gmail.com<mailto:ritt...@gmail.com>>, Gladhorn Frederik 
<frederik.gladh...@digia.com<mailto:frederik.gladh...@digia.com>>, Simon 
Hausmann <simon.hausm...@digia.com<mailto:simon.hausm...@digia.com>>, 
"aalp...@blackberry.com<mailto:aalp...@blackberry.com>" 
<aalp...@blackberry.com<mailto:aalp...@blackberry.com>>, Kai Koehne 
<kai.koe...@digia.com<mailto:kai.koe...@digia.com>>
Subject: QtWebSockets as add-on: current voting status

Hi,

The majority seems to agree that this should NOT go into the QtNetwork module, 
but should be an add-on.
Votes so far:

Peter Hartmann: +1 - add-on
Richard Moore: +1 - add-on
Konstantin Ritt: +1 - add-on
Frederik Gladhorn: +1 - add-on
Lars Knoll: +1 - QtNetwork

Simon Hausmann has questions regarding the QML component:
"Given that there exists a web idl for Web sockets, I suggest the qml api to 
consist of a QML element and a Javascript constructor. The prototype and the 
qml element should probably have the same api, the web Standard one.
It is in our interest that third-part JS code out there using web sockets can 
be used seamlessly in qml.”

Maybe it is interesting to know that the API of QML module evolved from 
‘function-based’ to ‘declarative-based’ after discussion with Alan Alpert. To 
me, the module feels fine, but there is of course much to say about the 
standard Web Sockets API as described in http://www.w3.org/TR/websockets/. I 
really don’t have an opinion here.
Of course, for a first version the QML module can be left out until the 
direction is clear on this.
What are your thoughts?

Cheers,

Kurt
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to