On terça-feira, 10 de dezembro de 2013 12:30:23, Knight Andrew wrote: > I don't think there's much benefit to rushing into this. In the cases where > WinRT's native API is wildly different than Win32, we can use a new CPP > file. Apart from a cleaner codebase, I don't see much benefit in ripping > out code before Qt 6 - leaving it there allows the community to continue > trying to support Windows XP.
That's why I asked if there's something that makes our codebase cleaner by cleaning up. Remember when we dropped non-Unicode Windows support? It cleaned up a lot of #ifdef UNICODE and QT_WA() usages. John has one point: he could remove the fallback code for the timezone support. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
