On segunda-feira, 4 de novembro de 2013 19:46:57, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote: > while i don't know this particular case, you must realize that we are > losing some potentially worthwhile contributions because people cannot > be arsed to push them to us. also, sometimes it's just so much more > efficient to simply take a patch and polish it yourself instead of > handholding a total noob who'll never make a second contribution anyway. > in that light i find it quite important to be able to judge the > threshold of copyright relevance ourselves.
Please contact the legal department of the company you work for and have them propose a modification to the Qt CLA that relaxes the requirements for incoming code. I would love to be able to submit any MIT- or BSD-licensed code, or even my code under those licenses. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
