On Tuesday, August 13, 2013 04:04:40 BogDan wrote: > > Bogdan, how does https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,61330 break the > > qt creator plugin? > > Hi, > > It breaks it because QTC plugin expects that .so libs to end with ".so" and > we need to synchronize the new QTC with Qt 5.2 release.
I don't understand. My patch does not change anything in the names of libraries. It only changes the SONAME embedded in the library. Please clarify. > Anyway QTC plugin > is the last thing that I'm worry about, probably it can be fixed in a few > hours/days. The major problem that I see is that we need to use symlinks > which for Android doesn't help at all, I don't understand. My patch doesn't have anything to do with symlinks. > IMHO the questions are: > > - Do we *really* need this change? It appears so. > - It's worth to break a lot of things to have this change? I don't understand the breakage scenarios. > - Isn't easier to fix cmake build system instead? I'm not convinced cmake is broken. > > Personally I don't think we need it and (for sure) I don't think it worth > the trouble. On the other hand, if on this list everyone else thinks that > I'm wrong and you'll decide to submit the patch, I'll obey and I'll start > to think how to handle this change in Ministro. Maybe you just need to read the patch again? Thanks, -- Join us in October at Qt Developer Days 2013 - https://devdays.kdab.com Stephen Kelly <[email protected]> | Software Engineer KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH & Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090 KDAB - Qt Experts - Platform-Independent Software Solutions
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
