for X64, msvc2012 is fine, but it seems that for XP 32, msvc 2012 is not possible If I have correctly understand.
2013/8/11 Laszlo Papp <[email protected]> > > > > On Sun, Aug 11, 2013 at 1:06 AM, Charley Bay <[email protected]>wrote: > >> Tony sayeth: >> >>> <snip>, >>> >>> We'd like to change the reference platforms a bit. We have new platforms >>> coming in and old ones are just that.old. >>> >> >> >>> <snip>, >>> >>> These changes would be targeted for Qt 5.2 and the current proposition >>> can be seen here: >>> >>> http://qt-project.org/wiki/CI_Configurations >>> >>> (That web page has been badly out of date, but I'm automating the update >>> process of it currently. >>> I will also keep the Qt argument list up to date so that you can see >>> what the differences are between the configurations.) >>> <snip>, >> >> >> This is a helpful page -- thanks! >> >> QUESTION: I see MSVC2012 start to show up for Win8 (only), and Win7 >> mostly stays with MSVC2010. >> >> Because Microsoft is pushing updates for their MSVC2012 (they are no >> longer updating MSVC2010, and it misses much C++11), our impression is that >> MSVC2010 is like "Vista", where it's just easier to "move-along" to the >> next version. However, we will be Win7 for the foreseeable future (we have >> no current efforts investigating Win8). >> >> Thus, our (Windows) "reference" platforms are MSVC2008 and MSVC2012 (we >> have no interest in 2010). Are other people doing this too? Is there >> interest in moving to MSVC2012 at the expense of MSVC2010? >> > > A few months ago, we moved from 2008 to 2010 because we were using Qt4 for > that project, and there were no official 2012 packages. I do not work > anymore in that project, but the plan was to move to 2012 once the Qt 4 to > 5 migration would take place. > > My impression is, and experience for that matter, a 2010 to 2012 change is > a common ongoing practice for Qt 5 customers. I have not seen many people > using 2008 with Qt 5. > > -- Laszlo > > > > >> >> --charley >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Development mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development >> >> > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development > >
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
