On domingo, 28 de julho de 2013 22:48:45, Milian Wolff wrote: > On Sunday 28 July 2013 12:18:15 Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On domingo, 28 de julho de 2013 13:51:13, Matt Broadstone wrote: > > > Is there a reason this wasn't added for convenience? Or, would there be > > > interest in me submitting a patch to include this in a later version of > > > Qt? > > > We should even be able to fix this seamlessly with templates unless I'm > > > mistaken. > > > > Go ahead and submit the deleter class. > > But don't make it mandatory for QObject (which is how I understood your "fix > this seamlessly with templates"). You usually don't have to delete > QObject's with deleteLater afaik.
Right. Submit *just* the new class and document it. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
