On 18/05/2013, at 12:50 AM, Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> wrote:
> On sexta-feira, 17 de maio de 2013 11.37.19, Turunen Tuukka wrote: >> We should agree practice for the community build maintainers. >> >> Would the existing maintainer model fit this purpose? >> >> The approach could be, e.g.: >> >> 1. We agree together that there is something we want to have with Qt (such >> has already been to large extent agreed for more MinGW configurations, >> Ministro Android distribution and Tizen). >> >> 2. There exists someone who wants to provide the builds >> >> 3. Nomination of the build maintainer is done according to our governance >> model (similar to other maintainers) >> >> 4. Sysadmin creates needed access for the appointed maintainer to place >> packages into download.qt-project.org (e.g. under community builds) > > I agree. > > Our resources are limited, so having the process above (which is quite > simple) > should suffice for builds we host. > > For builds we do not host, such as Aleksey's MinGW builds, I propose we > simply > list them in the downloads page and link directly. We should do that for > Linux > distribution packages too. +1 from my side. Let's go with this proposal for now. Cheers, Lars _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
