On Apr 3, 2013, at 1:22 PM, Olivier Goffart <[email protected]>
 wrote:

> On Wednesday 03 April 2013 08:16:20 Sletta Gunnar wrote:
>> https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,52682
> 
> That looks like a big change for the 'stable' branch.
> Did you not want to target 'dev' instead?

The change to qtquick touches a several files, but doesn't change anything, so 
I would consider it safe for stable. It could even go into a patch release, if 
needed. It could also go nowhere if the opposition feels strongly.

cheers,
Gunnar
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to