On 19 Dec 2012, at 9:13 AM, André Somers wrote: > Op 14-12-2012 8:45, Bache-Wiig Jens schreef: >> What I would propose is that we keep the QAction exactly as it is and make >> it possible to use it from QML as well as introduce a new slightly >> simplified QML Action component as previously suggested. The only drawback >> to this approach is that actions you declare in QML won't be immediately >> usable from C++, but I don't see this as a big issue. You will either keep >> everything in QML or have your business logic including your QActions >> defined in in C++. > As mentioned by others, this would mean that any C++ core that you write > would *have* to pull in QtWidgets in order to be able to use actions. > Even if you only have a QML gui. Not very attractive, if you ask me.
No, that idea is meant to be in parallel: if you have legacy code which already creates QActions maybe it's possible expose them to QML; but for new QtQuick code we will have a new action which doesn't depend on widgets. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
