On terça-feira, 18 de dezembro de 2012 22.15.04, Oswald Buddenhagen wrote:
> moin,
>
> prompted by the discussion about the blackberry branch, i again started
> to wonder about a cleaner separation of the branches.
>
> in the qtcreator repository for example i established the convention
> that temporary branches must all have a wip/ prefix.
> a similar convention could be adopted for vendor branches, say a vendor/
> (gasp!) prefix.
>
> go/no-go?

I'd say go.

qtbase already has a lot of branches that will need renaming (ios, winrt,
etc.)
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to