I know that branch naming is a possible topic for endless bike shedding. You can always find arguments against a certain name here. In the end it's not the most important thing whether it's called testing or stable. It's the meaning that we as a community associate with the branch name that's important.
But to shorten this: We've had that discussion a couple of months ago, and the names mentioned are the ones we in the end agreed to. let's stick to these. I won't re-open that discussion again. Lars On Nov 29, 2012, at 8:22 AM, Joseph Crowell <[email protected]> wrote: > I agree with d3fault on this one. > > On 29/11/2012 1:07 PM, d3fault wrote: >> "always close to releasable" = testing >> >> -dev >> -testing >> -release or stable >> >> eradicates any chance of confusion, regardless of who is "right" >> >> >> d3fault >> _______________________________________________ >> Development mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
